Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHossain, Tahmid
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-30T07:00:08Z
dc.date.available2026-03-30T07:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.uiu.ac.bd/handle/52243/3396
dc.description.abstractThis PRISMA-guided systematic review (219 documents) investigates Bangladesh’s cryptocurrency prohibition (FEPD 24/2022) against enabling frameworks in South and East Asia. While peers like India, Pakistan, and Singapore adopt regulated models, Bangladesh remains isolated due to a ten-factor institutional capacity deficit covering financial stability, AML/CFT, and infrastructure. This "Bangladesh Paradox" identifies digital-ready demographics—including 80 million bKash users—constrained by regulatory gaps rather than technical barriers. For the accounting profession, prohibition breeds ICAB competency deficits in asset classification (IAS 38 vs. IAS 2) and audit verification. The study proposes a 36–48 month, four-phase adoption framework—modeled on ASEAN practices—incorporating five-layer safeguards for FATF compliance. Findings suggest that while prohibition is a defensible interim risk strategy, it becomes unsustainable before the 2028–2030 FATF evaluation. Proactive professional capacity building is urged to bridge the widening competitive gap and address growing national opportunity costs effectively.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCryptocurrency regulation, Bangladesh, ASEAN, accounting challenges, IFRS, institutional capacity, AML/CFT, regulatory framework, systematic review, PRISMA.en_US
dc.titleCryptocurrency Regulation and Accounting Challenges: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh and Regional Frameworksen_US
dc.typeProject Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record